why do you think this, Nils? he said that he would give "Roe" and "Planned P. v. Casey" the respect due a Supreme Court precedent under stare decisis. But that is very, very far from saying he will unconditionally vote to uphold the abortion right. See the discussion at http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/09/roberts-precedent-and-abortion.html.
why do you think this, Nils? he said that he would give "Roe" and "Planned P. v. Casey" the respect due a Supreme Court precedent under stare decisis. But that is very, very far from saying he will unconditionally vote to uphold the abortion right. See the discussion at http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/09/roberts-precedent-and-abortion.html.
ReplyDelete