Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Roberts and abortion

Either Roberts is lying to the Senate, or he won't overturn Roe v. Wade. And if does overturn Roe v. Wade, he should be charged with perjury.

1 comment:

Sam said...

why do you think this, Nils? he said that he would give "Roe" and "Planned P. v. Casey" the respect due a Supreme Court precedent under stare decisis. But that is very, very far from saying he will unconditionally vote to uphold the abortion right. See the discussion at http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/09/roberts-precedent-and-abortion.html.